darchildre: rebis in a purple trenchcoat, looking enigmatic (rebis says:)
2023-09-27 12:00 pm
Entry tags:

(no subject)

So, the other day, I checked out a copy of The Stones of Muncaster Cathedral by Robert Westall. The book contained the title novella (which I had read before, but when I was a kid) and another called "Brangwyn Gardens".

The title novella is delightful - a lovely, old-fashioned M R James-style ghost story, with an engaging and vivid voice for its first-personal narrator. Highly recommended.

But the second one was so disappointing that I had to write this post to complain about it. It also starts off as an old-fashioned style of ghost story: the one in which a student has rented a room in a creepy old house which has a creepy landlady and might be haunted. This is generally a type of spooky story I enjoy, so I had high hopes. The story is set in 1955 but the haunting is from WWII - long enough ago that the protagonist was alive during the Blitz, but was a small child. This also works, as the protagonist gets mixed up between his own memories and what may be ghostly occurrences. The atmosphere in general is very well done.

Unfortunately, it quickly becomes clear that this is one of those "the protagonist falls in love with a ghost" stories. I don't care for those very much - I am perhaps too aroace for the premise to work on me, so the idea of falling in love with someone via reading their diary and smelling the ghost of their perfume and going through their long-abandoned underthings (!) just seems creepy, in an unappealing way. But that's a personal thing - the idea of falling in love with a ghost certainly must work for a lot of people, as it's a fairly common ghost story type.

But then! There is an infuriating twist! )
darchildre: second doctor playing solitaire (bored now)
2023-03-29 08:25 pm
Entry tags:

(no subject)

I've been reading a lot of scifi and mysteries so far this year - I've only this weekend finished my first horror novel of 2023. Unfortunately, it was The Spite House by Johnny Compton, which was a huge disappointment. I wanted to like this book so much! Alas.

Spoilers )

Now I'm going to have to go find myself a better horror novel to wash the boring out of my brain.
darchildre: a scarecrow with a pumpkin head, looking menacing (halloween)
2022-09-30 08:56 am
Entry tags:

(no subject)

Today is September 30th, which means it's almost October! This year, I am going to do a thing I think about doing every October but have never actually done, which is to reread Zelazny's A Night in the Lonesome October by reading only the appropriate dated entry every day till Halloween. I intended to do it last year but ended up galloping through the whole thing in about two days because I hadn't read it in so long.

A Night in the Lonesome October is the horror equivalent of a cozy mystery: the premise is that a bunch of people are gathering to perform a mysterious ritual which builds throughout the month of October, wherein some of them are working at cross-purposes. The participants are people like Count Dracula or the Wolfman or Sherlock Holmes, and the book is narrated by Jack the Ripper's dog. The tone is a mix of homey and spooky, but never actually scary. It's delightful and I love it.

I've been trying to work out when I first read the book and I think I must have been about 12 or 13. I had definitely read Dracula (Dracula and Sherlock Holmes are probably why I picked it up in the first place) so I was older than 11, but I hadn't read any Lovecraft, so not yet 14. It's enjoyable if you aren't familiar with Lovecraft, but a little more fun if you are. Since I did it backwards, I got to be delighted when I reached parts of Lovecraft's Dreamlands that I knew from Zelazny.

Do you have favorite cozy Halloween media?
darchildre: the master reading war of the worlds (reading)
2022-05-27 03:06 pm
Entry tags:

(no subject)

As previously mentioned, I have been rereading Pet Sematary. I finished it today, and have mostly learned that my vague 10-years-ago impression was correct and that I don't really care for it. I mean, it's not bad - certainly readable and entertaining enough. Just doesn't quite work for me. However! It has allowed to figure out a way to articulate why it doesn't work for me, which is useful.

So, a work of horror fiction is trying to produce certain emotions in the reader/viewer/whatever: suspense, dread, disgust, shock, horror, terror, etc. These all fall broadly under the larger umbrella of "fear", but different works mix them together in different ways and proportions, so you get a different-tasting cocktail of fear every time. Pet Sematary has a little horror, a little suspense and disgust, but it mostly runs on dread. Which I'll define for my purposes as "a Bad Thing is inevitably coming, there is no possibility of avoiding it, but we're going to drag out the time between now and the Bad Thing arriving as long as we can, because that will create tension in the reader."* With a side of "the Bad Thing will be brought about by the protagonist making a Bad Decision, and you get to feel dread about that too".

Pet Sematary wants to make the reader experience dread and it's very good at it. And that's why it doesn't work for me - I hate dread. The rest of the fear emotions I listed are things I enjoy experiencing in the context of horror fiction. They're why I'm a horror fan. But I don't find dread enjoyable on any level. Dread sits in my stomach in the same place that I experience real-life anxiety. It's not fun at all.

Contrast that with Misery, which I read right before Pet Sematary. Misery runs mostly on suspense (with a little horror and disgust) and that was fun - I tore through the book, I chose reading it over other activities, I enjoyed myself thoroughly. Pet Sematary, on the other hand, felt like a slog. I had to make myself read it, because the fear emotion it produced was so different and so dread-ful. There were a couple of times that I almost decided to stop reading - had it not been Stephen King, who is always engaging for me even when I don't care much for the particular book I'm reading, I would have. I've definitely given up on books before because they contained too much dread** and I couldn't make myself turn the page.

(Also the ending is anticlimactic and resurrected!Gage is uninteresting. Timmy Baterman, in the flashback, was interesting - Gage is a baby with a knife, like something out of a not-very-good slasher film. You get the silly slasher stinger ending too.)

Anyway. Just doesn't work for me. Also, again: none of the horror in this book would have happened if the characters were responsible pet owners who kept their cat indoors. Keep your cats indoors! It's better for the environment, it's better for the cat, and it lessens the possibility that you might try to resurrect your dead son as a horrible slasher movie monster.







*The difference between dread and suspense, to my mind, is that suspense is "a Bad Thing might be coming - is the protagonist going to be able to escape/prevent it?" Suspense allows the hope, however miniscule, that the dice will roll in the protagonist's favor. With dread, the protagonist can only roll a nat 1.

**The particular flavor of "I know this character is going to make an awful and self-destructive decision and I have to specifically dread that for age" will make me drop a book quicker than basically anything else.
darchildre: the master reading war of the worlds (reading)
2022-05-24 11:00 am
Entry tags:

(no subject)

I'm doing a bit of a casual Stephen King reread at the moment, as I tend to have difficulty with attention span in terms of reading in the summer and Stephen King is never any work for me. Currently, I am rereading Pet Sematary for the first time in probably at least a decade. It's not one of the ones I've read a bunch, which means that I don't remember much about it beyond broad strokes. So that's fun.

However. I know this book was written in 1980-whatsit and that attitudes have shifted since then* and sure, it wouldn't have solved everything but man, I keep getting stopped by the fact that a whole bunch of the bad shit that is about to go down in this book simply would not have happened if the characters had been responsible pet owners who kept their cat indoors.

That is not the moral that is intended by the book but I'm just saying, it's a moral that is there.





*Though I will say that my family had cats all through the 80's and they were all indoor pets. Our sin was that they were all declawed, a thing that attitudes has thankfully also shifted on.
darchildre: a scarecrow in a cloud of crows.  text:  "stranger things" (stranger things)
2021-09-30 01:03 pm

(no subject)

Things:

- It is so dark outside today. I'm sure this is unpleasant for many people, but I am finding it so comfortable and soothing. The grey times are properly here! Hooray!

- Way back in the summer, I had hoped/planned to be attending the HPLFF in Portland this weekend, and so I requested some time off. I made the decision not to travel - spending a whole 3-day weekend in a movie theater no longer seems like a great idea - but I still have the time off, starting tomorrow and ending next Wednesday. So, I had a week-long vacation and now I will be having Vacation, part 2. My plan is to finish my current sweater and do some larger cleaning projects I've been putting off.

- The festival did offer a streaming option, so I am going to watch at least some of the films at home, but they aren't streaming them till next weekend.

- My tiny solo rpg has picked up some steam this week, so I've been actively playing it a lot. Cut for rambling rpg discussion. )

- I just checked out My Heart is a Chainsaw from the library today - it'll be October tomorrow, so it's time to start shifting towards more concentrated horror reading. I'm planning to go through the as-yet-unread horror on my bookshelves and try to read at least some of them.
darchildre: seventh doctor and ace, moody and muted (ghostlight)
2021-01-02 06:59 pm
Entry tags:

(no subject)

I just finished reading Dark Matter by Michelle Paver. About which two things:

1) Y'know how sometimes you finish reading a book you loved and are immediately seized with the very particular sadness of knowing you can never read it for the first time again? That's where I am right now. After being at least vaguely disappointed by basically every horror novel I read in 2020, it's wonderful to start out this year with a book that was exactly everything I wanted it to be. I need to buy myself a copy.

2) I find the discussion questions for book groups that are occasionally included in books irritating at the best of times, as I feel compelled to read them and they're nearly always bad but there is something especially infuriating at getting to the end of a perfect beautiful ghost story to find that one of the discussion questions is "was the haunting real?" That's just - it's the least interesting or important way to talk about a ghost story, please stop.
darchildre: dracula and renfield, staring at each other.  text:  "vampiric seduction" (vampiric seduction)
2020-10-19 08:14 pm
Entry tags:

(no subject)

This month, my library's Classic Book Group read Dracula and I was invited to their (virtual) meeting as the library vampire expert. This makes two meetings of this bookgroup I have attended. The last was in 2009. Both meetings were discussions of Dracula, because I am nothing if not consistent.

It was a super fun discussion that I enjoyed immensely. I was very restrained in my enthusiasm, only made one joke about train timetables, did no excited infodumping, and did not use the word "homoerotic" even once. The topic of "is vampirism oral sex?" was brought up but not by me. I did get to talk about magic blood transfusions, Renfield's weird fascinating religiosity, and the wonderful fact that Dracula calls himself "Count de Ville" at one point, which I had entirely forgotten. It is always wonderful to talk about this book with people who are new to it, and especially with people who are new to horror in general, because they always have some new and interesting thing to say that I have not considered and I love being able to once again see my favorite book with fresh eyes.

Also, I got to reread Dracula on work time and got paid to discuss it tonight, which I would absolutely have done for free.

Good times.
darchildre: a scarecrow in a cloud of crows.  text:  "stranger things" (stranger things)
2020-10-17 06:33 pm
Entry tags:

(no subject)

Currently, I am reading The Invited by Jennifer McMahon, which is a fun and enjoyably ghost/haunted house story with the twist that the protagonist is in fact building the haunted house in question. However, it is also doing one of my least favorite horror things, which is:

Female Protagonist: I am the protagonist! I might be a SAHM mom or I might have a career but it's probably not in the sciences. I am likely interested in history to one degree or another.

Her Boyfriend/Husband: I definitely have a job in a STEM field. I encourage my wife's interests because they are endearing to me, but I do not really take them seriously.

Female Protagonist: I have had an experience wherein I encountered something supernatural! Within the universe of the story, this is absolutely true, but my boyfriend/husband did not witness the event.

Her Boyfriend/Husband: I absolutely do not believe in the supernatural (because I am a Rational Man in a STEM field) and thus do not believe that your experience happened the way you described. I will condescendingly try to convince you that it could not have happened.

Female Protagonist: I am continuing to have supernatural experiences!

Her Boyfriend/Husband: Despite mounting evidence, I still will not countenance the existence of anything supernatural and will instead berate you when you talk about your experiences in increasingly belittling ways.


A) I hate this dynamic so much and am not much appeased by the fact that it usually ends with the husband/boyfriend's death due to a supernatural occurrence and b) I have been trying to recall if I have ever seen the dynamic with the genders swapped. It would probably still be irritating, but I'd be interested in reading/watching a story with that dynamic, if only just the once.
darchildre: children reading books in a field. (books are for adventure!)
2019-10-11 06:32 pm
Entry tags:

(no subject)

Today I started reading T Kingfisher's The Twisted Ones, which I had put on hold some time ago and about which I didn't remember anything other than the fact that I had been assured that the dog didn't die.

You guys, spoilers )

I am stupidly happy about this.
darchildre: sepia toned, a crow perched on a gravestone (gravestone)
2019-08-10 09:17 am
Entry tags:

(no subject)

Wasteland: The Great War and the Origins of Modern Horror: I will now spend my first chapter talking about Nosferatu.

Me: Okay, rad, I love Nosferatu. I am wondering if you're going to backtrack and cover The Cabinet of Dr Caligari at all, however. Seems, y'know, relevent.

Wasteland: The Great War and the Origins of Modern Horror: ::continues to talk about Nosferatu and Albin Grau's interest in vampires::

Me: It's just that you don't have an index or any sort of list of works that you're going to discuss and while those are valid choices, it means that I can't check to see if you're going to cover things.

Wasteland: The Great War and the Origins of Modern Horror: ::discusses Aleister Crowley's influence on Nosferatu::

Me: That is absolutely super interesting but now I'm really distracted by this question. I mean, it's cool if you aren't going to talk about Caligari - I just want to know.

Wasteland: The Great War and the Origins of Modern Horror: Did you know that F W Murnau was queer?

Me: I DID NOT, as the horror films of the 1920s are not my specialty but I am both happy to learn than and also unsurprised, as it is as an article of faith with me that all early horror film is queer as fuck.

Wasteland: The Great War and the Origins of Modern Horror: Did you know that, on average, 1300 German soldiers died per day during WWI? That's more people than live in your town.*

Me: Holy shit.






*Three hours later, I realize that I cannot add. Poulsbo has a population of 10,000, not 1,000. So this is not more people than live in my town, but it is more people than live in my Dad's hometown.
darchildre: the master reading war of the worlds (reading)
2019-07-24 01:43 pm
Entry tags:

(no subject)

Hello friends! Would you like to recommend me a horror novel to read?

I just finished The Cabin at the End of the World by Paul Tremblay. Mr Tremblay is a compelling writer and I know that many people enjoy his work very much but I hated almost the entire book - I think I kept reading out of spite, more than anything else. Because he gets generally good reviews in horror circles, I had hoped that my extremely similar reaction to his Head Full of Ghosts was due to the fact that I tend to dislike possession horror a lot, but no. I just dislike his books.

Anyway. I want to read a different horror novel to get the taste out of my mouth, but cannot settle on anything. Would any of you like to suggest one?
darchildre: the master reading war of the worlds (reading)
2018-12-11 07:56 am
Entry tags:

(no subject)

So, I'm rereading The Shining for the first time in...a while. It's not my favorite Stephen King but it's good and solidly enjoyable. (And not, for me personally, scary enough that I can't read it before bed, which is a plus.)

But.

Y'all, I read enough of a certain type of fantasy literature as a child that I to this day immediately and automatically read any word that looks weird and made up backwards just in case*. And I get that the characters often literally can't do that but I can only engage with the book as written media. And given Stephen King's habit of picking a significant word and having it recur and recur and recur throughout whatever he's writing**, by about halfway through, the fact that we are still acting like the meaning of "redrum" is a big scary mystery is just annoying as all hell.





*Every once in a while, I run into a Harry Potter fan who still has not done this with the Mirror of Erised. It is always a fun time.

**Which usually I'm pretty into.
darchildre: Tiny Flash with his arms up going "yay!" (flash says yay!)
2016-06-12 07:55 am
Entry tags:

(no subject)

Things:

- I have gotten so bad at updating, OMG.

- I bought new boots last week. They are Doc Martens and are black with secret rainbows. In that, they are coated with some kind of oil-slick looking substance that you can only see in the right light. I love them, but we are still in the breaking-in process so they hurt my feet.

- My mom is currently in Alabama (ferrying my grandmother to my aunt's house), so Dad and I are on our own. Since most of the tv shows we watch together we also watch with Mom, we're saving them till she gets back and I am getting random movies that look fun for for Dad and me from the library. So far, we have watched Lady from Shanghai and Field of Dreams. You guys, I had never seen Field of Dreams before and it is far and away one of the weirdest stories I've ever seen. I mean, I kinda loved it but wow. That is some weird baseball magic.

- Also, I have read too much Stephen King in my life to think that strange voices in the corn are ever something you should listen to. Don't build a baseball field! Burn down the corn instead!

- Relatedly, I am currently reading 14 by Peter Clines, and Dracula, and Caligari's Chlidren, which is a book on horror film from the late 70's. (Written just before Halloween. The author talks a lot about how horror film comes in waves and I have this weird gleeful joy that he's standing right in front of another one and doesn't know it. I hope he enjoyed it.) And, y'know, I am just a fundamentally happier person when part of my brain is thinking about monsters and horror film. I suppose that's why I always reach for horror when I'm in a bad place. But I am not in a bad place right now, so basically my monsters just make me happy.

- Today, I am meeting my sisters in Seattle for brunch and we are going to the ballet. That sentence sounds like it ought to belong to someone else's life, but it is indeed mine.
darchildre: text:  library rules 1) silence 2) books must be returned by due date 3) do not interfere with the nature of causality (library rules)
2016-05-27 01:05 pm

(no subject)

Good things:

The other day, I discovered that a horror author I very much like and whom I thought had only ever written two books - T.E.D. Klein - had, in fact, written a third book. Or, at least, had a collection of some of his previously uncollected short fiction published in 2006. It was a limited release and copies now are prohibitively expensive, but a nearby library system had one. So I put in an ILL request and got it in less than a week! It is in my bag right now and I get to start it on my break! (And then maybe I will reread The Ceremonies, because it's been long enough that I don't remember the details of the scary bits.)


Not so good things:

One of my first patrons of the day brought in a book that he had to return because it was on hold for someone else, but wanted to put it back on hold for himself. Which I did for him, and then told him, in response to his question, that he was now 10th in line for it and it would be a little while before he got it back. And he frowned and walked away, loudly monologuing about how sad and disappointed his wife would be that they wouldn't be getting it again sooner. 10 minutes later, his wife came up to check out and loudly told me that she was, indeed, disappointed.

People, fussing at me does not get your book here faster. I do not control the holds queue.
darchildre: children reading books in a field. (books are for adventure!)
2015-01-15 03:07 pm

(no subject)

Yesterday, the children's librarian at Bainbridge made a difficult decision - we have a bunch of John Bellairs hardcovers with the Edward Gorey illustrations, and they just don't check out. They've consistently been on our dusty shelf reports (the reports of books that don't ever get checked out) for years now and we just don't have space to keep them. So they had to be weeded.

Now, this is a tragic thing. But, on the upside for me, she knows that I also love John Bellairs and she wanted the satisfaction of knowing that at least some of the books would be going to a loving home. Which is why I now have hardcover copies of The Lamp from the Warlock's Tomb and The Secret of the Underground Room with the Edward Gorey illustrations.



Friends! Do you like: kid-lit, excellent writing, gorgeously spooky things that aren't gory, inter-generational friendships, well-researched occult phenomena, American small-town life in the late 1940's, and happy endings that usually involve eating cookies? Then you should go to your local library and get some John Bellairs - save them from the dusty shelf report. You will not be disappointed.

There are three series, each about a different boy and his elderly friend: Lewis Barnavelt (and his uncle Jonathan and their neighbor, Mrs Zimmerman, both of whom are witches), Anthony Monday (and Miss Eels, a librarian at the library where Anthony volunteers), and Johnny Dixon (and Professor Childermass). I'll give you a recommendation from each series:

For Lewis Barnavelt, you should start at the beginning with The House with a Clock in its Walls. Lewis comes to live with his uncle Jonathan, but Jonathan's house used to belong to a wizard working to bring about the end of the world and there is a clock hidden somewhere in the house, ticking down to Doomsday. I basically stole this book from my third grade teacher and read the cover off before I returned it to her.

For Anthony Monday, try The Dark Secret of Weatherend, in which Anthony and Miss Eels have to stop an evil wizard from transforming the world into an icy wasteland. There's a scene in this book where they almost get killed by leaves that I think about every autumn.

And for Johnny Dixon, start with The Curse of the Blue Figurine. There's ghosts, dead priests, possession, Egyptian artifacts, and evil magic rings. It's pretty great. Honestly, all the Johnny Dixon books are pretty great.

There's also an adult novel - The Face in the Frost - which is about two wizards and is lovely (and scary enough that I don't listen to the audiobook at bedtime). Well worth checking out.

So go - read John Bellairs! And then come back here and talk to me about it, because these books were a mainstay of my childhood and I don't get to talk about them nearly enough.
darchildre: Tiny Flash with his arms up going "yay!" (flash says yay!)
2014-07-03 02:19 pm
Entry tags:

(no subject)

Ahahaha, my library is getting me an ILL copy of Les Mains d'Orlac in English translation.

Oh my god, I love the ILL system. It is the best thing.

(Triumph, Galatea!)



ETA - Also, in looking for other translations of fiction by Maurice Renard, I found this page. Which appears to want to sell me not only Maurice Renard but also a) Lord Ruthven fanfiction, b) a book in which both Victor Frankenstein and zombie Napoleon appear, and c) Sherlock Holmes vs Fantomas.

I'm sorry, just, all of that is utterly absurd and wonderful and I want all of it.

What an amazing time to be alive.
darchildre: dorothy in the ruins of oz.  text:  "beware the wheelers" (beware the wheelers!)
2014-06-24 09:53 pm
Entry tags:

(no subject)

Things:

- So I started rereading Carmilla instead. I say "rereading", because I have technically read it before, but I was about 9 years old and missed pretty much everything important and don't really remember it at all. But hey, 22 years later, it's pretty great.

- The last 15 minutes the library was open tonight, we had no patrons. So it was just me and the other nerdy person who works there, standing around talking about stuff. And I discovered something inexplicable - I knew that he had watched at least some Farscape, because he understood a reference I made to it some months ago. But tonight it came out that he has only watched the first season and isn't really sure that he liked it and I'm pretty sure I just sort of sputtered at him incoherently for a minute because Farscape! ::flaily hands:: I mean, intellectually I understand that there must be people who don't like Farscape but I don't really grok the idea, y'know?

- There are children outside my window, chasing one of the local wild rabbits with a fishing net. (Okay, it may be a feral rabbit, as it is piebald.) I viciously hope it will bite them.
darchildre: second doctor playing solitaire (bored now)
2014-06-24 06:51 pm
Entry tags:

(no subject)

The problem with being a fan of somewhat obscure older horror in the age of the modern internet is that one gets spoiled. I mean, if I want to read basically any work of horror literature that's currently in public domain, someone has probably put it up somewhere that I can download it. Usually for free, but if not, for a very reasonable price. Which is awesome!

But it only works if the work was originally in English*.

And that is why I am currently feeling ridiculously annoyed by the fact that I apparently cannot access a reasonably priced English translation of Les Mains d'Orlac. Because I want it and I read nowhere near enough French to just download the original.

I guess I just have to learn more French.





*I have no doubt that non-native speakers of English experience this all the time in the reverse which would be equally annoying and I'm sorry.
darchildre: dracula and renfield, staring at each other.  text:  "vampiric seduction" (vampiric seduction)
2013-10-07 07:42 am
Entry tags:

(no subject)

Yesterday, Mom and I drove to Gig Harbor to do some thrifting and go to a community theater production of Dracula. I bought a scarf and a hot water bottle*, we had frozen yogurt, and there were vampires.

It was, bizarrely, the most book-accurate adaptation I've ever seen. To the point of having large swaths of dialogue taken directly from the original. They conflated all of Lucy's suitors into one character - Dr Seward, of course, because he's the one you have to keep - and they telescoped the timeline a little, so Mina and Jonathan were around for the Bloofer Lady, but everything else was there, even the absurd blood transfusions. It was community theater, of course, so the acting wasn't stellar and the guy who played Renfield was over the top for my tastes but still, it was a lot of fun.

It's amazing to me how much I still love this story. It's one of the oldest of my fandoms that's still around - only Sherlock Holmes and Phantom of the Opera are older - and I still want to spend time revisiting it, reimagining it, expanding on it. It's still absurdly important to me and every time I think that I'm totally over vampires, totally done with them, I find some new and ridiculous Dracula-related thing and the love comes back.

Anyway. I totally put the audiobook on my ipod to listen to today. 8)


*Because I had been looking for one for a while - they are surprisingly difficult to find in brick-and-mortar stores where I live. Also, it is the best thing ever, OMG. So ridiculously cozy!